Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Special Education Training and Tools of the Trade.
Describe issues related to training special education teachers to use technology.
According to our textbook, it states that most teachers start with minimal experience in using technology in the classroom. That despite efforts their knowledge is inadequate in their exploring the possibilities that technology offers.
Some of the few issues are as follows:
An issue regarding training in special education technology centers in the use of interdisciplinary teams for evaluating the need for assistive technology and decision making in the selection of the appropriate devices and services.
Another is the assistive technology itself for it was first developed to meet the needs for students that had low-incidence disabilities.
Yet another issue is the dialogue between teacher and student. That can not be taught to a teacher. The teacher needs to be able to community the assignment. For some of the students, their disabilities are severe. Still other issues are the time constraints to learn the technology, location of the training facility, the financial support to be able to send these teachers to be trained to use the technology. The greatest issue is even being able to obtain the technology to be trained on the equipment to be able to use with the student or students, who need it. So the individual’s, who needs to be able to be taught, is an issue in itself.
Give examples of no-tech, low-tech, and high-tech solutions for special students.
No-tech solutions- A no-tech plan relies more upon people than upon aids. There is no better solution than to simply be prepared and practice. This means practice an evacuation routes on a regular basis, this makes people feel comfortable and safe. Create a buddy system and pair up students, who may have a disabilities with a partner that can community with them, it will help should the need arrive and it will make the rescue faster. Also, designate a meeting place.
Low-tech solutions- A plan will often use pictogram or signs in order to convey a message quickly during an emergency, which can be useful to people who are hearing impaired, don’t speak English, or cannot read. Using the universal symbol for hospital is a more common example of a low-tech pictogram. Also, add Braille to signs, especially signs that label an exit or which floor of a building you are on. They are inexpensive, these signs may save the life of someone who is blind and trying to navigate an unfamiliar building alone. Emergency alarms that can be both seen and heard, and doors that can be opened without exerting a lot of strength.
High-tech solutions – When using high tech the following can be considered.
Electronic Communication Boards that are similar in principle to their Low Tech counterparts. The difference being two-fold, the ECBs are electronic and more frequently utilize programs such as Board maker as a resource for collecting symbols for communication of intentions. With this program you have the ability to create, modify and develop communication boards that are more detailed and tailored to the individual.
Telecommunication devices are utilized for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. These devices assist the user to communicate through the use of a electronic keyboarding device. There are also keyboards that are positioned at different angles to provide for correct ergonomic function.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hey Juanita, great post as always. Funding is something that has got a lot of schools at a disadvantage. THe chapter talks about a lot of devices that could be used for students with severe disabilities. But the truth to this is that these devices cost a grip load of money. I've worked in an ALE unit for 4 years now and I've seen students with the most severe disabilities you can think of. Yet the same basic technology that has no effect is being used with these students. This is becasue of funding being so pour like you have stated in your post. It is going to continue to stay like this until more funding is available.
ReplyDeleteJuanita, the issue that you stated that most teachers have minimal experience in using technology in the classroom seems to be one that might be more easily resolved with a unified training approach in colleges and universities. What do you think? Experience is gained from the “doing” of something. Baseball players gain experience by playing baseball, teachers gain experience by teaching, etc. I found it interesting that the assistive technology services selection process is often the result of advocacy efforts rather than the work of interdisciplinary teams. The teams are in place to give a multi-disciplinary evaluation of a student’s needs but this system of selecting assistive technologies doesn’t seem to be applied consistently. Liked your responses to the examples of no, low, high-tech solutions.
ReplyDelete